0.00/0.10	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.10	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.10/0.31	% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
0.10/0.31	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.31	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.10/0.31	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.10/0.31	% WCLimit    : 180
0.10/0.31	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 05:52:53 EDT 2024
0.10/0.31	% CPUTime    : 
0.16/0.42	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.16/0.43	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.L1GE1y1Vc9/E---3.1_17039.p
0.16/0.44	# Version: 3.2.0-ho
0.16/0.44	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMCSSN.
0.16/0.44	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.16/0.44	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 900s (5) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 180s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 180s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# post_as_ho5 with pid 17117 completed with status 0
0.16/0.44	# Result found by post_as_ho5
0.16/0.44	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMCSSN.
0.16/0.44	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.16/0.44	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 900s (5) cores
0.16/0.44	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true)
0.16/0.44	# Search class: HUUNF-FFSF00-MSSFFFNN
0.16/0.44	# partial match(1): HUUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
0.16/0.44	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.16/0.44	# Starting new_ho_10 with 487s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 91s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting new_bool_1 with 82s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting new_bool_2 with 82s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting new_bool_9 with 82s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# new_ho_10 with pid 17121 completed with status 9
0.16/0.44	# Starting sh5l with 76s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# new_bool_2 with pid 17125 completed with status 0
0.16/0.44	# Result found by new_bool_2
0.16/0.44	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMCSSN.
0.16/0.44	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.16/0.44	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 900s (5) cores
0.16/0.44	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true)
0.16/0.44	# Search class: HUUNF-FFSF00-MSSFFFNN
0.16/0.44	# partial match(1): HUUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
0.16/0.44	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.16/0.44	# Starting new_ho_10 with 487s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 91s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting new_bool_1 with 82s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting new_bool_2 with 82s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.16/0.44	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.16/0.44	
0.16/0.44	# Proof found!
0.16/0.44	# SZS status Theorem
0.16/0.44	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.16/0.44	thf(decl_22, type, cG: $o > $o).
0.16/0.44	thf(decl_23, type, cF: $o > $o).
0.16/0.44	thf(decl_24, type, cP: ($o > $o) > $o).
0.16/0.44	thf(decl_25, type, esk1_0: $o).
0.16/0.44	thf(decl_26, type, esk2_0: $o).
0.16/0.44	thf(decl_28, type, esk4_0: $o).
0.16/0.44	thf(cTHM627, conjecture, (((cP @ cG)&(cP @ cF))=>((cP @ (^[X1:$o]:((~((cF @ ((X1))))|(cG @ ((X1)))))))|(cP @ (^[X1:$o]:(((cF @ ((X1)))|(cG @ ((X1))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.L1GE1y1Vc9/E---3.1_17039.p', cTHM627)).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((((cP @ cG)&(cP @ cF))=>((cP @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:$o]:((~((cF @ Z0))|(cG @ Z0)))))|(cP @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:$o]:(((cF @ Z0)|(cG @ Z0)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM627])])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, (((cP @ cG)&(cP @ cF))&(~(cP @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:$o]:((~((cF @ Z0))|(cG @ Z0)))))&~(cP @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:$o]:(((cF @ Z0)|(cG @ Z0))))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~((cP @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:$o]:(((cF @ ((Z0)))|(cG @ ((Z0)))))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, (cP @ cF), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~((cP @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:$o]:((~((cF @ ((Z0))))|(cG @ ((Z0)))))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (cP @ cG), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_7, plain, ((^[Z0/* 9 */:$o]:(((cF @ ((Z0)))|(cG @ ((Z0))))))!=(cF)), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_8, plain, ((^[Z0/* 9 */:$o]:((~((cF @ ((Z0))))|(cG @ ((Z0))))))!=(cG)), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_9, plain, ((^[Z0/* 9 */:$o]:(((cF @ ((Z0)))|(cG @ ((Z0))))))!=(cG)), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_6])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_10, plain, (((cF @ ((esk1_0)))|(cG @ ((esk1_0))))<~>(cF @ ((esk1_0)))), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_11, plain, ((~((cF @ ((esk4_0))))|(cG @ ((esk4_0))))<~>(cG @ ((esk4_0)))), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_12, plain, (((cF @ ((esk2_0)))|(cG @ ((esk2_0))))<~>(cG @ ((esk2_0)))), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_13, plain, ~((cF @ ((esk1_0)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_14, plain, ~((cG @ ((esk4_0)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_15, plain, ~((cG @ ((esk2_0)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_16, plain, (cG @ ((esk1_0))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])]), c_0_13])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_17, plain, ~((cF @ ((esk4_0)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])]), c_0_14])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_18, plain, (cF @ ((esk2_0))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])]), c_0_15])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_19, plain, ((esk1_0)<~>(esk2_0)), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_20, plain, ((esk1_0)<~>(esk4_0)), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_16])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_21, plain, ((esk2_0)<~>(esk4_0)), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_22, plain, (~((esk1_0))|~((esk2_0))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_23, plain, ((esk4_0)|(esk1_0)), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_24, plain, (~((esk2_0))|~((esk4_0))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_25, plain, ((esk2_0)|(esk1_0)), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_26, plain, ~((esk2_0)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23]), c_0_24])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_27, plain, (~((esk1_0))|~((esk4_0))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_28, plain, (esk1_0), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_29, plain, ~((esk4_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28])])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_30, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]), c_0_26]), c_0_29]), ['proof']).
0.16/0.44	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.16/0.44	# Parsed axioms                        : 4
0.16/0.44	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
0.16/0.44	# Initial clauses                      : 4
0.16/0.44	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.16/0.44	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
0.16/0.44	# Processed clauses                    : 51
0.16/0.44	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.16/0.44	# ...subsumed                          : 6
0.16/0.44	# ...remaining for further processing  : 44
0.16/0.44	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.16/0.44	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.16/0.44	# Backward-subsumed                    : 4
0.16/0.44	# Backward-rewritten                   : 5
0.16/0.44	# Generated clauses                    : 47
0.16/0.44	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 47
0.16/0.44	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.16/0.44	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
0.16/0.44	# Paramodulations                      : 4
0.16/0.44	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.16/0.44	# NegExts                              : 4
0.16/0.44	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.16/0.44	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.16/0.44	# Total rewrite steps                  : 6
0.16/0.44	# ...of those cached                   : 4
0.16/0.44	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.16/0.44	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.16/0.44	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.16/0.44	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.16/0.44	# Current number of processed clauses  : 20
0.16/0.44	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
0.16/0.44	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.16/0.44	#    Negative unit clauses             : 12
0.16/0.44	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
0.16/0.44	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3
0.16/0.44	# ...number of literals in the above   : 5
0.16/0.44	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.16/0.44	# Current number of archived clauses   : 24
0.16/0.44	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 22
0.16/0.44	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
0.16/0.44	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
0.16/0.44	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30
0.16/0.44	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.16/0.44	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
0.16/0.44	# BW rewrite match successes           : 1
0.16/0.44	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.16/0.44	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.16/0.44	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 1500
0.16/0.44	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 40
0.16/0.44	
0.16/0.44	# -------------------------------------------------
0.16/0.44	# User time                : 0.003 s
0.16/0.44	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.16/0.44	# Total time               : 0.007 s
0.16/0.44	# Maximum resident set size: 1828 pages
0.16/0.44	
0.16/0.44	# -------------------------------------------------
0.16/0.44	# User time                : 0.015 s
0.16/0.44	# System time              : 0.008 s
0.16/0.44	# Total time               : 0.023 s
0.16/0.44	# Maximum resident set size: 1704 pages
0.16/0.44	% E---3.1 exiting
0.16/0.44	% E exiting
0.16/0.44	EOF